|
1
|
- Bielinski M. Santos
- James P. Gilreath
- Timothy N. Motis
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- 392 kg/ha, 0.25 m deep.
- Beds covered with low-density polyethylene (LDPE) mulch.
|
|
6
|
- Applying every year for selected crops in the US.
- Allowing limited use of MBr until suitable alternatives are widely
accepted.
- With approved CUE, reduced rates of MBr are needed:
- Offset the rising cost of the fumigant,
- Reduce atmospheric emissions.
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Determine the effect of reduced MBr + Pic rates under VIF on Cyperus and
Tylenchorhynchus control in bell pepper.
|
|
9
|
- Fall 2002 and spring 2003 at the Gulf Coast REC (UF).
- A split-plot design with six replications.
- Main plots:
- MBr + Pic (67:33 v/v): 0, 98, 196, and 392 kg/ha.
- Subplots:
- LDPE (Pliant Corp., USA) mulch,
- VIF by Hytibar (Klerks Plastic, Belgium), and
- VIF by Bromostop (IPM, Italy).
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Cyperus shoots on the top of each bed:
- 5, 8, and 16 weeks after transplanting.
- Stunt nematode populations:
- 14 weeks after transplanting.
- Marketable pepper fruits were harvested three times.
- Orthogonal contrasts.
- Regression analysis.
|
|
12
|
- There were no differences between the two VIF films.
- Therefore, data from both VIF were combined for comparisons against LDPE
mulch.
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- It appeared that MBr + Pic rate could be reduced between 25 to 50% of
the commercial rate under either VIF.
- Effective nutsedge and stunt nematode control could be obtained this
reduced MBr + Pic rate under VIF.
|
|
18
|
- Gilreath and Santos (2004) discussed similar results with other VIF
brands in bell pepper.
- From the practical standpoint:
- Bell pepper growers could plan applying less MBr + Pic if VIF is
utilized,
- Results should be validated in grower demonstration/validation trials.
|